Welcome to the Family Echo Q&A forum. In order to ask or answer questions, please ensure you sign in at Family Echo first.
Welcome to Family Echo Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.

In order to ask or answer questions, please ensure you sign in at Family Echo first.

Before asking a question, please check the Frequently Asked Questions page.

Need More "Relationship Types"

+3 votes
321 views
It's an awkward request...but what about one-night-stands, affairs, sexual assaults?

I include all of those when they result in children. I can understand "affairs" going under "relationships", but if a one-night-stand is just a hookup, and a sexual assault definitely isn't a relationship.

Those should reflect accurately.
asked Jun 5, 2022 by Egunning83 (480 points)
Right now you can have: partners, extra partners, and ex-partners. I think what you want to cover could be covered as an ex-partner. But maybe a new non-partner type would be better. It would be a good idea to see how other genealogy programs handle this, and to see if whatever you want to do fits within the GEDCOM format.
commented Jun 7, 2022 by lsommerer (51,650 points)

Please log in or register to answer this question.

 | Snow Theme by Q2A Market
Powered by Question2Answer
...